In order to conduct the analysis, the following questions may help guide you. Some of these questions may not really pertain to your project or what you are attempting to do, and that's okay--remember these are just questions to help you get started with the analysis. Also, you may have other questions you'd like to address, and that's fine as well. These questions are guides--tools to help you further your own analyses.
- For each textual remediation, what has changed? How? Why?
- For each textual remediation, what has remained the same? How? Why?
- How does audience interaction vary with each remediation of the text? Why?
- If you have a remediation where audience interaction does not change, why do you think that is?
- Does each textual remediation affect our perception/understanding/interaction with the original text? If so, how and why? If not, how and why?
- What technologies are incorporated with each remediation? How/why does that alter the original?
- Why was each remediation selected for this project? Why were these five specifically chosen?
- What is the value of understanding remediation? (This can be pedagogical value, personal value, etc.)
The remediation analysis can be written as an overall analysis, an introduction to your piece, in blurbs analyzing each remediation as you go through them, etc. You can audio record the analysis instead of writing it out. You can write a song for the analysis. You can do a combination of techniques for analysis. It's really up to you--and there is no right or wrong here. (Well, it can be wrong in the sense that you don't analyze the remediations in a thorough, thought-provoking manner, or you just throw something together...yeah, that would hurt you a lot...)
As for format, you don't have to use just one medium. You don't have to use more than one. You cannot use the same medium you did for your first project. You will need to explain why you chose the medium/s you did for your project. In other words, don't choose a medium that you consider to be easy that doesn't really make sense with your project. It needs to go with your project, and you need to be able to explain to me how it does (something more than "I really like this site", "I am really familiar with this site", etc. is needed).
Throw questions re: analysis here on this blog, and I'll respond to them asap.
KT
Alyssa Maige. Supa helpful as always Professor Thayer!
ReplyDeleteHeadache coming along...:) lol
ReplyDelete-Daniela Diaz
Thanks a bunch! -Shannon Mitchell
ReplyDeleteAhhh, thank you! I've had my text and remediations picked out for a while, but I wasn't sure how to go about writing the analysis.
ReplyDeleteJessie Donath
awesome! thanks!
ReplyDeleteJessica Griggs
thanks
ReplyDeleteBrynne
Got it!
ReplyDeleteCasey Vaughan
I AM SO EXCITED!
ReplyDeleteJessica Crow
Thanks a million! Emily
ReplyDeleteThe wheels are a-turnin'
ReplyDeleteCoral Bachen
Thanks!! (x2)
ReplyDeleteI've tried to sign at least two of these in prior weeks and it wouldn't allow me to using AIM, so I created a Blogger account.
:::crosses fingers::::
- Danielle
Thanks! This is very helpful!
ReplyDeleteMary Cecil
Thank you!
ReplyDeleteClaire Ramos
ReplyDeleteJohnathan Morris
ReplyDeleteAlso, I just want to say that my brain is about to meld with the Interwebs because of this project. The way I'm going about it is creating a space of complete hypermediated immediacy that it's frightening as I pull myself away to evaluate all the tabs and windows I have open (and let's not forget Zotero sucking space at the bottom of my screen creating even more windows and spaces).
ReplyDeleteAll in a good sense, of course. So meta.
@Johnathan: Scrambled brains is a good thing! Very excited to see the end result! (And, yes, meta, is key here;))
Delete